Avicenna Journal of Dental Research

Published by: Kowsar

Iranian Viewpoint about Various Attractiveness Indices of Rhinoplasty in comparison with International Standards

Ali Heidari 1 , Mohammad Reza Jamalpour 1 , Fariborz Faghihi 1 , * and Farshid Vahdatinia 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Faculty Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
2 Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Article information
  • Avicenna Journal of Dental Research: December 2017, 9 (4); e60362
  • Published Online: December 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 16, 2017
  • Accepted: December 3, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ajdr.60362

To Cite: Heidari A, Jamalpour M R, Faghihi F, Vahdatinia F. Iranian Viewpoint about Various Attractiveness Indices of Rhinoplasty in comparison with International Standards, Avicenna J Dent Res. 2017 ;9(4):e60362. doi: 10.5812/ajdr.60362.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Avicenna Journal of Dental Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Algozzine B. Perceived attractiveness and classroom interactions. J Exp Educ. 2015;46(1):63-6. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1977.11011612.
  • 2. Boyatzis CJ, Baloff P, Durieux C. Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity. J Genet Psychol. 1998;159(3):337-44. doi: 10.1080/00221329809596155. [PubMed: 9729839].
  • 3. Hafezi F, Kouchakzadeh K, Naghibzadeh B. History and status of nose surgery. Iran J Surg. 2009;17(2):88-94.
  • 4. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JJ. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(1):72-80. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0072:EDITST>2.0.CO;2. [PubMed: 11843277].
  • 5. Pitak-Arnnop P, Hemprich A, Dhanuthai K, Yildirim V, Pausch NC. Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(5):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.07.007. [PubMed: 20832328].
  • 6. Borelli C, Berneburg M. "Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder"? Aspects of beauty and attractiveness. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(5):326-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07318_supp.x. [PubMed: 20537001].
  • 7. Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004;117(3):313-32. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002. [PubMed: 15500809].
  • 8. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature. 1994;368(6468):239-42. doi: 10.1038/368239a0. [PubMed: 8145822].
  • 9. Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14(1):7-18. [PubMed: 10337246].
  • 10. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49(9):963-9. [PubMed: 1886024].
  • 11. Cross JF, Cross J. Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty. Dev Psychol. 1971;5(3):433-9. doi: 10.1037/h0031591.
  • 12. Naini FB, Cobourne MT, Garagiola U, McDonald F, Wertheim D. Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: A quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(4):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.010. [PubMed: 26880014].
  • 13. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(6):738-46. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr098. [PubMed: 21846874].
  • 14. McArdle A, Young R, Kelly MH. Preferences for the white female nasal supratip break. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(4):366-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3ca1. [PubMed: 22421480].
  • 15. Valentine T, Darling S, Donnelly M. Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004;11(3):482-7. [PubMed: 15376799].
  • 16. Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):103-11. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq028. [PubMed: 20558590].
  • 17. Kaipainen AE, Sieber KR, Nada RM, Maal TJ, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(6):602-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv087. [PubMed: 26666568].
  • 18. O Neill K, Harkness M, Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(4):371-6. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.109492. [PubMed: 11029730].
  • 19. Gandhi P, Patel K, Arora PS, Patel N. The Perception of facial profile attractiveness by changing the lower facial vertical and antero posterior proportion. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2016;7(6).
  • 20. Springer IN, Zernial O, Nolke F, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, et al. Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(2):629-37. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000298095.18943.72. [PubMed: 18300984].
  • 21. Springer IN, Zernial O, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, Wolfart S. Nasal shape and gender of the observer: implications for rhinoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.04.001. [PubMed: 18485721].
  • 22. Gomes GA, Tomita S, Guimaraes GS, Lima CF, Mosciaro MS, Simas TB. Aesthetic comparison of the ideal nasal radix height in Brazilians. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(3):334-40. [PubMed: 21739008].
  • 23. Lanier HB, Byrne J. How high school students view women, the relationship between perceived attractiveness, occupation, and education. Sex Roles. 1981;7(2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/bf00287800.
  • 24. Lu Y, Zhang X. Analysis of facial profile preferences among the Chinese population. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000;35(3):224-6.
  • 25. Zylinski CG, Nanda RS, Kapila S. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101(6):514-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70125-T. [PubMed: 1598891].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments