Effect of Zooming, Colorization, and Contrast Conversion on Proximal Caries Detection

Authors Information
Article Notes and Dates
To Cite : Valizadeh S, Rahimian S, Balali M, Azizi Z. Effect of Zooming, Colorization, and Contrast Conversion on Proximal Caries Detection, Avicenna J Dent Res. 2017 ;9(1):e29368. doi: 10.5812/ajdr.29368.
Abstract
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Tam LE, McComb D. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part II. Recent diagnostic technologies. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67(8): 459-63[PubMed]
  • 2. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions. Caries Res. 2001; 35(3): 193-9[PubMed]
  • 3. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997; 26(1): 32-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(5): 539-42[PubMed]
  • 5. Brian JN, Williamson GF. Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36(1): 18-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Dolekoglu S, Fisekcioglu E, Ilguy M, Ilguy D. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40(6): 379-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kamburoglu K, Senel B, Yuksel SP, Ozen T. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of in vivo and in vitro photostimulable phosphor digital images in the detection of occlusal caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(1): 17-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Moystad A, Svanaes DB, van der Stelt PF, Grondahl HG, Wenzel A, van Ginkel FC, et al. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003; 32(6): 390-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Lehmann TM, Troeltsch E, Spitzer K. Image processing and enhancement provided by commercial dental software programs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002; 31(4): 264-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008; 37(1): 18-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Haiter-Neto F, Casanova MS, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(1): 116-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Hintze H. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(2): 78-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pthol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85: 113-8
  • 14. Wenzel A. A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(5): 307-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Pereira AC, Eggertsson H, Martinez-Mier EA, Mialhe FL, Eckert GJ, Zero DT. Validity of caries detection on occlusal surfaces and treatment decisions based on results from multiple caries-detection methods. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117(1): 51-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Swenson E, Hennessy B. Detection of occlusal carious lesions: an in vitro comparison of clinicians' diagnostic abilities at varying levels of experience. Gen Dent. 2009; 57(1): 60-6[PubMed]
  • 17. Novaes TF, Matos R, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP, Mendes FM. Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth--in vivo study. Caries Res. 2009; 43(1): 36-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Stachniss V, Maschka R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems. J Dent. 2009; 37(3): 204-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Eickholz P, Kolb I, Lenhard M, Hassfeld S, Staehle H. Digital radiography of interproximal caries: effect of different filters. Caries Res. 1999; 33(3): 234-41[PubMed]
  • 20. Belem MD, Ambrosano GM, Tabchoury CP, Ferreira-Santos RI, Haiter-Neto F. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Braz Oral Res. 2013; 27(3): 245-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Kositbowornchai S, Basiw M, Promwang Y, Moragorn H, Sooksuntisakoonchai N. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(4): 236-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Mehr-Alizadeh S, Sadri D, Nemati S, Sarikhani S, Zafarfazeli A. Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of intra oral digital radiography with and without zoom option software in the detection of occlusal dentinal caries: an in vitro study . J Islamic Dental Asso IRAN . 2012; 24(1): 62-8
  • 23. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 2009; : 273
  • 24. Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Caplan D. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus. Gen Dent. 2005; 53(1): 43-8[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiaion Alert via Google Reader

Cited By:

Avicenna Journal of Dental Research accepts terms & conditions of:

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Citedby Linking DOI enabled Crossref iThenticate COPE Cross Check